IM FINISIHED

And she is fini....Yahhh!!! Im done Im done Im doen Im done Im done
Time to go to sleep get some rest take the SAT tomorrow and get ready for prom
YIPPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE


HEY MR. PARRY DON'T 4GET I GAVE U MY FREE CHOICE ON LIKE WED. IT WAS THE CD WITH THE 4 SONG ON IT....

Persuasive Analysis #4

“The Raw politics reconfirm ‘rassilnization’ of nation,” an extremely humorous article, is an insight to the mind of an American citizen that appears to detest the rules and regulations of politics. Although the author allowed the audience to conjure his/her own political views on the 2008 presidential candidates, he uses pathos to adhere to the emotions of the people. The speaking, surprisingly, uses a happy, humorous motivating force; he realizes that most Americans already think politics are stupid childish games that call for a series of tits for tats. Frank Wooten is hoping that the audience will become emotionally charged and realize the impending jeopardy of the nations presidential future.

Within the article, Wooten’s stance on Clinton’s, Obama’s, McCain’s, and Regal’s characters is not only evidence of pathos, but also evidence of personal attack, which is attacking or praising the people who make an argument, rather than discussing the argument itself. Although the Wooten is looking out for the best interest of America, he uses emotion to distract the reader from the facts. Each of the candidates made political errors, but instead of judging their opinions or political decisions, the author, in a sense, attacks their character and demeanor. While reading this article, reader may agree or disagree with author based emotional humor, instead of a decision based on logic.

{Mr. Parry read the article its hilarious!!).

Persuasive Analysis #3 (Gun Control)

“Chicago misfire on banning solution to gun homicides” is a political insight to the issue of gun control. Although the article is interesting and thoroughly written, Chapman uses pathos to adhere to the emotions of the people. He literally feeds off the anger of the people to help justify his stance on gun control. This emotional motivation was an intelligent effort by Chapman, considering most Americans detest the notion of breached safety policies. Though the article is just a newspaper clip, Chapman appears to be hoping that the people would become emotionally enraged and dispute the present regulations on gun control.

Within the article, Chapman’s political stance on gun ban’s not only confirms evidence of ethos but, also evidence of emotional and Either/Or fallacies. The specific type of emotion fallacy used by Chapman is Argumentum Ad Misericoridam, an emotional appeal concerning what should be a logical issue during a debate. Instead of directly directing the issue, Chapman uses emotions to distract the audience from the facts at had. He grasps that the law-abiding United States citizen had the right to protect his/herself in the time of danger. The specific type of Either/Or fallacy used by Chapman is “False Dilemma, the result of when a writer builds an argument upon the assumption that there are only two choices or possible outcome s when actually there are several. Chapman informs the people “Gun control hasn’t worked as a remedy for crime. So what makes anyone think the answer is more gun control?” which can be translated to mean that there are only two answers to the sinister issue, one is gun control and the other is no gun control. And no gun control is the logical solution.

Although Chapman was fighting for the due privileges of gun owners, he used emotional pathos and fallacies to appeal to the mind of the people. However, this plan could possibly backfire because quite a few people reading this article would probably make decisions based on emotional outrage than making a logical decision based on the proposals of gun issues of both sides of the law.

Persuasive Analysis #2 (BAN Solids)

BAN’s advertisement for the product Solids is a multicolored and exhilarating ad that appeals to teenagers of all age groups. However, the creator of BAN’s advertisement applied ethos, persuasion based on the reader’s character or image, to make the product more appealing. By using ethos, the author is able to reinforce a reader’s sense of duty, and in this case, it means purchasing a potent deodorant.

The writer of the article encompasses a sense of creativity, which appeals to the young and vibrant minds of teenagers. He/She is particularly able to draw the reader in when they give the consumer the opportunity to participate in designing an advertisement for the company. Another characteristic that assists in the persuasion is the design of protection. The creator’s line “Intensely fresh formula keeps you fresher than ever to protect you form the attention you don’t need,” creates a sense of trust between teenage girls and the creator, the creator being the ultimate protector who will provide a strong brand of deodorant.

In addition to the use of ethos as persuasion, the writer uses the rhetorical fallacy false need. False need is the argument that creates an unnecessary desire for things. The creator appeals to teenagers by making them feel as though BAN is the strongest type of deodorant on the market that will provide the ultimate protection. However, the reader may fail to notice that there are other great companies on the market that provide equal if not better protection.

Persuasive Analysis #1 (TRESemme)

TRESemme’s advertisement for the product Big Boost is flamboyant and appeals to both women and girls of all ages. However, the writer/creators of this advertisement apply ethos, persuasion based on the writer’s character or image, to make the product appealing. If the application of the persuasion is effective, that the reader would feel inclined to believe what the ad is attempting to promote.

The writer of the advertisement seems to encompass good sense, good morals, and overall a good character. This is especially evident when the creator applies the phrase, ‘You won’t have to sell you soul to get his kind of body” to the ad. If the audience believes that, the writer/speaker has nothing but good intentions, the product advertised will sell more efficiently.

Along with the use of ethos as persuasion, the writer uses the rhetorical fallacy false need. False need is arguments that create an unnecessary desire for things. Because the writer understands that women despise expensive hair products, he appeals to the audience by saying, “Its long-lasting formulas let you pump up your hair’s volume, without deflating your wallet,” giving women the idea that TRESemme could possibly be the one product used for volume boost without expensive cost. However, some women will fail to notice that the author places to warnings of hair damage due to excessive use. The product may be cheap but women would rather have hair with no volume than damaged hair with no volume.

Persuasive Analysis Summary #4

“Raw politics reconfirm ‘rassilinization’ of nation,” is a fascinating article written by Frank Wooten that simply relates the world of wrestling to that of politics. The article begins by describing Obama and Hilary Clinton as video game types of people who fight to their finish in the wrestling ring; “Pitting video-game-type renderings of Barack Obama, in dark sport coat with no tie, and Hillary Clinton in red pantsuit. The Obama character opened strongly with suplexes and neckbreakers before Clinton character rallied with elbow drops off the top rope and a jolting choke slam” (Wooten 1). Clinton, Obama, McCain, and Regal are all, in a sense, satirized through the technical terminology of the WWE.

Through each wrestling analogy, Wooten refers to political moments in which candidates faltered. For example, he points out Obama’s comment about the “bitter’ voter and those who “cling to their guns and religion” (1). He ploys McCain to become the person who ultimately wants no involvement in the political confrontation between Obama and Hilary; “Looks lie Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama wanna settle their differences in the ring. Well, that’s fine with me” (1). McCain is supposedly going to stay out of the democratic confrontation and follow the policies of Bush by keeping the American soldiers in Iraq. Ultimately, he would “introduce Osama bin Laden to the undertaker” (1). McCain goes further to state that America needs WWE because it is a symbol of our freedom as Americans. Wooten than goes on to make fun of Sir William Regal, who ridicules American’s as being colonist incapable of effective self-rule.

Overall, the article is an enlightenment of what the political world is about, “a no hands barred, no time limit death match that we’re all born to eventually loss.”

Persuasive Analysis Article #4

Persuasive Analysis Summary #3

The preceding ad, created by BAN, advertises a innovative type of deodorant. Most teenage girls have problems trying to unearth the perfect deodorant so BAN created a new deodorant called Solids; some deodorants make girls suffer from perspiration and putrid smells. Well, BAN guarantees that Solid will “keep you fresher than ever to protect you from the attention you don’t need.” The deodorant also comes in fresh scents such as Paradise Breeze. BAN also formed a way to get its consumers involved with the advertisement of the product. Girls have the opportunity to make an ad related to the deodorant and feature it on the BAN Brand website.

{Once again, Parry sorry for it being so short. It was another magazine article so I didnt have a lot to base my summary off of}

Persuasive Analysis Article #3

Persuasive Analysis Summary #2

The scanned article is an ad created by TRESemme, a shampoo company that advertises a new product called “Big Boost.” Considering that many women feel uncomfortable with the lack of volume of their hair, TRESemme invented a root lift hair spray that allows the women to change the volume of their hair without “selling their soul.”

As the described by the ad, women are able to “add salon gorgeous body to their” hair with the volume collection created by TRESemme. The created formula is so special that it allows women to use long lasting products to boost volume without deflating their wallet. TRESemme is ultimately a professional product made affordable for women. Other products used to help with the frustrating aspects of hair include volume, curl, control/hold, anti-breakage, color revitalize, moisture, and thermal creations.

{Sorry it's so short Mr. Parry...It's a magazine article so I didnt have much to base my summary on}

Persuasive Analysis Article #2

Persuasive Analysis Summary #1

“Chicago misfires on banning solution to gun homicide,” is an article written by Steve Chapman. He discusses the Chicago blunder in banning guns to help alleviate the homicide rate.

The writer evaluates past murder rates without the ban of guns. According to the records, only one murder involving assault weapons has occurred as of March 31. He continues on to declare that in past years, Chicago has put a ban on the manufacture and sale of guns, yet the murder rated dropped in 1991, 3 years before the law was enacted. Some of the murder rates fell shortly after the gun ban bill was enacted; however, this proves no direct correlation between the two issues. According to Gary Kleck, most criminals’ work with stolen guns so the band typically doesn’t affect them.

Chapman believes that by enacting a gun ban criminals are permitted to carry on like common citizens, while people “who rarely misuse their guns were deprived of options. Furthermore, the supply of guns will never cease because there are over 200 million private guns, guns have an extremely extensive life, and it does not take that a great deal of effort to provide criminals with guns. Chapman ultimately believes that gun control has never worked in the past, so more gun control would be just as ineffective.

Persuasive Analysis Article

Traitor (Poem #4)

Traitor

I am a traitor. I am a victim of bigotry.
I am not what they expect me to be.
I don’t dye my hair or get the latest fashion of clothes.
I am a traitor. A victim to many woes.

My nails are not 10 inches long.
My process and ways of thinking are all wrong.
Intelligence they tell me is the path of success.
Yet, I am outcast due to very the intellect I possess.

Am I a traitor? What makes me so different?
Are my choices of direction dissident?
What causes me to be such an unusual case? Now I understand, I must understand
I am a traitor. I am a victim of separatism from my own race.

River of Tears (Poem #3)

A River of Tears

A heart is broken
And a life is token is pulled away
As her heart gets heavy, the water appears
And she begins to cry a river of tears.

The pain she bears
That no one cares
Would soon dim the light that
Had shined so bright.

She stood in her room
Thinking that her life was doomed
That life had no meaning
No fun, no happy greetings.

Her teacher tried to reach her
And show that he cared
So that no a single hour or
Minute of her life should be spared

She walked out that day
With her head held high
Knowing that she was full of pride.
She went home and knew that she needed someone
But when she looked no one was there.

She was corrupt through high school
Thinking that no one was there
To she the hard times
That she bared.

That very night she took her very life
Due to all those long years filled with grief and strife
At her funeral her teacher appeared
He spoke of all her wonderful qualities as his eyes began to tear

He spoke of those years he tried to save her life
That somewhere in her body must have been an ounce of might
But now she was in a greater place
With no more agonies to face

For years and years to come
It was her grave that her teacher would never depart from
For he was finally there to share those long years
Of the river of tears

Trying to Forget (Poem #2)

Trying to Forget

My mind races faster than the speed of light
I flip the pages of the memory book that bring so much pain
I see and remember the different phases of my life
Yet I find that your face is not there.

My mind flashes back to a time before I remembered
Such a small child screaming for you to come home.
There she stood in the mirror tears streaking down her face
Praying to God, hoping he would make everything ok.

Slowly and whimsically, you disappear from the page
Just as you disappeared from my life.
It was only on weekends that I saw your face
Then with time, those weekends became years.

Each year I try to forget the pain you caused me
Forget those nights I cried myself to sleep on your behalf
Forget all those father days’s spent alone
Forget the man you used to be
Forget the father that use to forget his child.

"Yesterday" Song Analysis

“Yesterday”, a lonesome ballad, written by Paul McCartney is in relation to the misfortune of vanished love. The general theme of this song appears to be regret. Support for this theme is found in McCartney’s use of connotation and figurate language.

Connotation, the use of diction, plays a noteworthy function in this song. McCartney uses connotation to enlighten the listener with the account of his lost love. Before this moment in his life his, McCartney had a principally astonishing individual in his life. His loss of this individual results in his longing for yesterday; “Yesterday all my trouble seemed so far away / Now it looks as though / They’re here to stay / Oh I believe in yesterday” (Beatles 1-5). “Yesterday,” McCartney was a man profoundly in love; with the departure of that, love came regret, regret for not appreciating yesterday.

A figurative language, figures of speech, is also an exceedingly significant aspect of the song. McCartney uses abstract things such as shadows to mirror his discontent in letting such a astonishing woman walk out of his life; “Suddenly / I’m not half the man I used to be / There’s a shadow hanging over me / Oh yesterday came suddenly (Beatles 6-10). The shadow is the grief imposed upon his soul It is also his heavy burden of regret and yearning for love.

Overall, McCartney created a simplistic song that means a great deal to numerous people. To one individual it may represent the lost love of a mother; to another individual it may represent the lost love of a girlfriend. The song ultimately contains few lyrics, but somehow they get the point across with the assistance of a beautiful melody.

Yesterday Lyrics

Yesterday - Beatles

Yesterday, all my troublesseemed so far away.

Now it looks as though t

hey're here to stay.

Oh, I believe in yesterday.

Suddenly,I

'm not half the man i used to be,

There's a shadow hanging over me,

Oh, yesterday came suddenly.

Why she had to go

I don't know she wouldn't say.

I said something wrong,

Now I long for yesterday.

Yesterday, love was such an

easy game to play.

Now I need a place to hide away.

Oh, I believe in yesterday.

Why she had to goI don't know

she wouldn't say.

I said something wrong,

Now I long for yesterday.

Yesterday,

love was such an easy game to play.

Now I need a place to hide away.

Oh, I believe in yesterday.

Mm mm mm mm mm mm mm.

"Eleanor Rigby" Analysis

“Eleanor Rigby,” one of the Beatles most appealing songs is in relation to the loneliness and lost love of all people. The theme of this song just happens to be similar to the denotation of the song: loneliness. The theme is supported by the Beatle use of connotation and figurative language.

Connation, the use of words, plays a noteworthy role in the song. This part of poetry assists with the explanation of the lives of Eleanor Rigby and Father McKenzie. The first stanza “Eleanor Rigby picks up the rice/ In the church where a wedding / Has been/ Lives in a dream / Waits at the window, wearing the / Face that she keeps in a jar by / The door / Who is it for?” (Beatles 3-10), illustrates the storyline of Eleanor Rigby as a worker who picks up rice after weddings. The third stanza “Father McKenzie writing the words / Of a sermon that no one will her / No one comes near / Look at him working. Darning his / Socks in the night when there’s nobody there / What does he care?” (Beatles 15-21), portrays the tale of the many vacant and futile sermons that aid no one. Both stanzas illustrate the mortifying suffering of loneliness. As a result of this loneliness, Eleanor Rigby died and was buried alone in a graveyard. Father McKenzie, too, proceeds to encompass roughly the same lonely life since he still is incapable of saving lives. Although the characters are not authentic, the listener can relate to the pain and torment felt by both characters.

Figurative language, the use of figures of speech, also plays a major role in supporting the theme of the song. The Beatles utilize rhetorical questions to convey the repetitive meaning of loneliness. The line “Who is it for?” (Beatles) speaks of Eleanor’s probable yearning to unearth a lover or acquaintance. The next line, “All the lonely people, / Where do they all belong?” (Beatles 11-12), questions the location of the calamity of all lonely people.

Overall, “Eleanor Rigby” evokes the ceaseless sentiment of loneliness felt by so many, yet acknowledged by so few. Once again, Lennon and McCartney composed a genius song that simply relates to many people.

Eleanor Rigby Lyrics

Eleanor Rigby - Beatles

Ah, look at all the lonely people

Ah, look at all the lonely people

Eleanor Rigby picks up the rice

in the church where a wedding

has been

Lives in a dream

Waits at the window, wearing the

face that she keeps in a jar bythe door

Who is it for?

All the lonely people

Where do they all come from ?

All the lonely people

Where do they all belong ?

Father McKenzie writing the words

of a sermon that no one will hear

No one comes near.

Look at him working. Darning his

socks in the night when there's

nobody there

What does he care?

All the lonely people

Where do they all come from?

All the lonely people

Where do they all belong?

Ah, look at all the lonely people

Ah, look at all the lonely people

Eleanor Rigby died in the church

and was buried along with her

name

Nobody came

Father McKenzie wiping the dirt

from his hands as he walks from

the grave

No one was saved

All the lonely people

Where do they all come from?

All the lonely people

Where do they all belong?